Gill v. Wyatt

It is insisted for complainant that the Chancellor erred in annulling and setting aside the decree entered on the" 20th of December, 1865, in favor of complainant against defendant, and allowing him to file his bill by way of defense to the original bill, under s. 3529 of the Code. The ground stated in the original bill for the attachment was that “defendant has absconded and left the State- of Tennessee, and gone beyond the limits thereof, so that .the ordinary process of law can not be served upon him.” After publication a decree ivas rendered on the 20th of December, 1865, giving judgment…