Commonwealth v. Friday
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
Appellant was indicted for rape. On the second trial 1 the court charged: “You might find one of three verdicts, guilty of rape, guilty of attempt to commit rape, or not guilty.” He was found guilty of attempted rape. His motion for a new trial was allowed, but, upon the Commonwealth’s petition for reargument, which was allowed, the new trial was refused. Appellant was sentenced to pay a fine of fl.00 and undergo imprisonment in the county jail for 4 months. On this appeal he did not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction and limited his argument…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Turner v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Commonwealth v. NeillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. AgostonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Appeal of HartranftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DessusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. McElroySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. YolkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.