Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Friday

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 1952No. Appeal, 48PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellant was indicted for rape. On the second trial 1 the court charged: “You might find one of three verdicts, guilty of rape, guilty of attempt to commit rape, or not guilty.” He was found guilty of attempted rape. His motion for a new trial was allowed, but, upon the Commonwealth’s petition for reargument, which was allowed, the new trial was refused. Appellant was sentenced to pay a fine of fl.00 and undergo imprisonment in the county jail for 4 months. On this appeal he did not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction and limited his argument…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Turner v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. NeillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth v. AgostonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Appeal of HartranftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. DessusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Commonwealth v. McElroySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. YolkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API