Legal Opinion

United States v. Cesar Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2013No. 12-50018PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Cesar Gomez appeals his conviction on one count of importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960, after he was caught crossing the border with methamphetamine in his car. Defendant claimed ignorance of the presence of drugs in his car, but the jury convicted him. On appeal, Defendant argues that the prosecution’s introduction of a post-arrest statement violated Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); that the admission of an expert witness’ testimony violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Salvador VeraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Tuan LuongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Vicente Cuevas-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  5. People v. Perez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API