Legal Opinion
Schenck v. Minolta Office Systems, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 1990No. 89CA0649PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge JONES.
In this action for malicious prosecution, defendants, Minolta Office Systems, Inc., Victor J. Yosha, and Russell Rumley, appeal from the judgment entered on jury verdicts returned against them and in favor of plaintiff, Timothy R. Schenck. We affirm.
Plaintiff was employed by American Office Equipment Company, Inc. (AOE), from January 1972 until January 1985. Defendant Yosha was AOE’s vice-president, and defendant Rumley was an employee of AOE.
In November 1984, Minolta purchased AOE. At that time, Yosha asked plaintiff to sell certain accumulated office equipment. In…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- N. W. Whitley, Cross-Appellant v. George W. Seibel, Individually and as a Police Officer of the Chicago Police Department, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Salida School District R-32-J v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Industrial Commission v. Moffat County School District RE No. 1Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Wainauskis v. Howard Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Williamsen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Mile Hi Concrete, Inc. v. MatzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Sherman v. American Water Heater Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Reid v. PyleColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Rome v. HEI Res., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.