Legal Opinion

Reade v. Continental Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in equity for the construction of a trust agreement.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The controversy here rests between the husband, plaintiff, and the wife, defendant, as the trustee, the Continental Trust Company, interposes no objection to the relief asked for in the complaint, except as it very properly requests the court to determine its duty that it may act upderstandingly in the performance of the trust agreement.

On the 20th day of January, 1896, the plaintiff and the defendant Martha A. Reade were married, and on the third day of October in the same year the trust agreement was executed by the plaintiff to himself and Asa Bird Gardiner, Mrs. Reade not being a party.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. . MatherNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Arnold v. GilbertNew York Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HorwitzNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1912
  2. Reade v. Continental Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Reade v. Continental Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API