Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hudson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 14, 2003No. 1011148PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

866 So.2d 1115 (2003)

Ex parte Russell HUDSON.

(In re Duane Haston, Jr., by and through his father and next friend, Duane Haston, Sr., and Duane Haston, Sr. v. C.F. Vigor High School, Mobile County School Board of Commissioners, Garner & Associates, Inc., and Interkal, Inc.).

1011148.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 14, 2003.

Rehearing Denied May 30, 2003.

Mark S. Boardman and Dana J. Bolden of Boardman, Carr, Weed & Hutcheson, P.C., Chelsea; and Bob Sherling, Jr., of Campbell, Duke & Sherling, Mobile, for petitioner.

Donald M. Briskman of Briskman & Binion, P.C., Mobile, for respondents Duane…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte ButtsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Phillips v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Ex Parte RizkSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hollis v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Howard v. City of AtmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Ex Parte City of TuskegeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Ex Parte KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Hollis v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API