Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Chaparro-Alcantara and Jaime Romero-Bautista

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 21, 2000No. 99-2721, 99-2874PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

Juan Chaparro-Alcantara and Jaime Romero-Bautista are Mexican nationals who were arrested for transporting illegal aliens. After their arrest, an INS agent informed them of their Miranda rights, but the agent did not inform them of their right under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention (“Article 36”) to contact the Mexican Consulate. The two then made inculpatory statements to the officers interviewing them. Both defendants sought to suppress the statements. They argued that the failure to inform them of their rights under Article 36 mandated the exclusion of the evidence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Darling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. Conde v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API