United States v. Juan Chaparro-Alcantara and Jaime Romero-Bautista
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Juan Chaparro-Alcantara and Jaime Romero-Bautista are Mexican nationals who were arrested for transporting illegal aliens. After their arrest, an INS agent informed them of their Miranda rights, but the agent did not inform them of their right under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention (“Article 36”) to contact the Mexican Consulate. The two then made inculpatory statements to the officers interviewing them. Both defendants sought to suppress the statements. They argued that the failure to inform them of their rights under Article 36 mandated the exclusion of the evidence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Darling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Conde v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.