Legal Opinion

In re Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

These are cross appeals by Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (PATH) and claimants Hudson and Manhattan Corporation (H & M) and Hudson Rapid Tubes Corporation (HRT) from the final decree entered June 13,1966, in a condemnation proceeding making awards for the Hudson Tubes Railroad and the Hudson Terminal Office Buildings, title to which vested in PATH. H & M is the fee owner of twin 22-story office buildings located at 30 and 50 Church Street, Borough of Manhattan. Special Term awarded $17,996,000 for the buildings based on a capitalization of projected net income. With that we are in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. City of New York v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Larkin v. . Nassau Electric R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Two Tracts of LandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Wettlaufer v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Matter of City of Ny (Civitano)New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1969
  5. National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. Cunningham Natural Gas Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API