Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 30, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 62-515PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANK J. MURRAY, District Judge.

This is an action brought July 18,1962 by the United States (plaintiff) pursuant to Title 49, Section 41(3), of the United States Code, a section of the Elkins Act, to recover treble damages against defendant for knowingly receiving and accepting from the Boston & Maine Railroad (Railroad) a rebate or concessionary offset against the regular charges for transportation of defendant’s freight in interstate commerce. The action was tried without jury. Written and oral stipulations were entered into by the parties and became part of the evidence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Davis v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  2. Barry Clifford v. M/v Islander and Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1971
  5. United States v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API