Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Mappin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 8, 1979No. 57179PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shulman, Judge.

Appellant-Tucker, on behalf of his minor son, brought suit against appellee-Mappin, under the family purpose doctrine, for injuries his son sustained while riding as a guest passenger in defendant’s car. From a jury verdict for the defendant, plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

1. One of the issues in contention was the identity of the driver of the automobile, both occupants of the vehicle claiming that the other was driving the car at the time it went off the road. The deputy sheriff who investigated the accident was called as a witness by the plaintiff. When asked his opinion on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Dual S. Enterprises, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Healan v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Massee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Roberson v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Classic Restorations, Inc. v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Gage v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Jackson v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Smith v. HendrixCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API