Legal Opinion

Bolster v. Graves

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 19, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

These are two actions, one in tort, in the nature of trover, and the other in contract for money had and *302received, by the assignee in insolvency of John S. Gibbon, for alleged preferences received by the defendants from Gibbon within six months before the filing of his petition in insolvency.

The proceedings in the case are under the Pub. Sts. c. 157, § 96, now the R. L. c. 163, § 110. In the Superior Court the case was sent to an auditor, who found in the action of tort that all the goods enumerated in the plaintiff’s amended declaration included in the items numbered 221 to 342, both…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Forbes v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Peabody v. KnappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Killam v. PeirceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Lamb v. McIntireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Bridges v. MilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rubenstein v. LottowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Atherton v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Manufacturers National Bank v. Simon Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API