Legal Opinion
St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Seabold
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 4, 1925No. 6918PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMeCLENDON, C. J.
This suit was by appellant, St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas, to recover from E. Sea-bold, appellee, the sum of $310.11, the alleged unpaid balance due for freight charges upon a car containing “contractor’s outfit” shipped from Smackover, Ark., to Powell, Tex. The petition alleges that the freight was shipped under a written bill of lading, signed by ap-pellee’s agent, in which the articles shipped were designated 'as “contractor’s outfit,” the regular published rate for which amounted, tn the aggregate, to $425.11, and that appellee had paid $115 thereon, leaving due the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Buzar v. First National Bank of GreenvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Faulkner v. ReedTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Baker v. ShafterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Camden Fire Ins. Co. v. YarbroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Texas Mut. Life Ins. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Worsham-Buick Co. v. IsaacsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Security Union Casualty Co. v. M. & v. Tank Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SpeedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- State v. Texas Mut. Life Ins. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932