Widrin v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for writ of review of an order of the Superior .Court of the City and County of San Francisco dismissing an appeal from the Justices’ Court. J. J. Van Nostrand, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
The petitioner was the defendant in a certain action in the justices’ court entitJed, “L. Bingham, versus M. Widrin.” Such proceedings were had therein that a' judgment was regularly entered in favor of plaintiff and against the petitioner. Within thirty days after the rendition and entry of the judgment, to wit, on November 30, 1910, the petitioner served and filed a notice of appeal, filed an undertaking in proper form, and on December 10th gave notice thereof. On December 12th the plaintiff served a notice of exception to the sureties, whereupon the petitioner gave notice that the sureties…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Golden Gate Tile Co. v. Superior Court, in & for City of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Dobson v. DobsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- W. P. Jeffries Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Blake v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Hellner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- City of Colton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913