Legal Opinion

Ruffin v. Sewell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1925No. 19206. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

This action was instituted to restrain the defendants, as commissioners of Diking District No. 22, of Skagit county, from proceeding to issue and sell bonds of the district, amounting to $1,300,000, for the purpose of providing funds for the carrying out of its plans for the-diking and drainage of the district.

In his complaint, the plaintiff makes four principal attacks upon the right of the commissioners to proceed: (a) That the petition for the organization of the district was not signed by a majority of the property owners owning lands within the proposed district; (b) that-notice of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Collins v. City of EllensburgWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Rothchild Bros. v. RollingerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Chandler v. City of PuyallupWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Jackson v. Commercial Waterway District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elston v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Stallsmith v. Alderwood Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API