Lee v. Rutledge
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from tbe Circuit Court for Harford County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBowie, J.
The appellants, Lee & Brother, sued the appellee in the Circuit Court for Harford County, in an action of trover.
The declaration set out that the plaintiffs were possessed of an improved Champion reaping and mowing machine, of the value of $190, which they lost, and the same came to the possession of the defendant, who converted the same, etc. The defendant pleaded first, actio non, because the machine in plaintiffs’ declaration mentioned, came into the possession of defendant, under an agreement between plaintiffs and defendant, that they would furnish defendant a good and sufficient machine…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Warfield v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Glenn v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1830
- Baltimore Marine Insurance v. DalrympleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
- Stirling v. GarriteeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nalle v. OysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Cochran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Billman v. State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- American Towing & Lightering Co. v. Baker-Whiteley Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.