Carter v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Debra Carter (“Carter”) appeals the district court’s judgment for the defendants. Under the relevant disability-benefits plan (“the Plan”), an independent claims administrator, Voluntary Plan Administrator (“VPA”), determines whether a claimant qualifies for benefits. Carter seeks review of VPA’s denial of her petition for long-term benefits, asserting that this denial was an abuse of the VPA’s discretion.
*527Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Insurance Co., 458 F.3d 955 (9th Cir.2006), filed the day before argument here, fundamentally changed how we review administrator determinations…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Lamantia v. Voluntary Plan Administrator, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- LaMantia v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Wright v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3Cited by2 opinions
- LaMantia v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Wright v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006