Legal Opinion

Carter v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2006No. 05-16231PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Debra Carter (“Carter”) appeals the district court’s judgment for the defendants. Under the relevant disability-benefits plan (“the Plan”), an independent claims administrator, Voluntary Plan Administrator (“VPA”), determines whether a claimant qualifies for benefits. Carter seeks review of VPA’s denial of her petition for long-term benefits, asserting that this denial was an abuse of the VPA’s discretion.

*527Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Insurance Co., 458 F.3d 955 (9th Cir.2006), filed the day before argument here, fundamentally changed how we review administrator determinations…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Lamantia v. Voluntary Plan Administrator, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. LaMantia v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Wright v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LaMantia v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Wright v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API