LaMantia v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Karen LaMantia (“LaMantia”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment for the defendant. Under the relevant disability-benefits plan (“the Plan”), an independent claims administrator, Voluntary Plan Administrator (“VPA”), determines whether a claimant qualifies for benefits. LaMantia seeks review of VPA’s denial of her petition for long-term benefits, asserting that this denial was an abuse of the VPA’s discretion.
Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Insurance Co., 458 F.3d 955 (9th Cir.2006), filed the day before argument in this appeal, fundamentally changed how we review…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Lamantia v. Voluntary Plan Administrator, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Carter v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Wright v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carter v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Lamantia v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Wright v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006