Legal Opinion

LaMantia v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2006No. 05-16744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Karen LaMantia (“LaMantia”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment for the defendant. Under the relevant disability-benefits plan (“the Plan”), an independent claims administrator, Voluntary Plan Administrator (“VPA”), determines whether a claimant qualifies for benefits. LaMantia seeks review of VPA’s denial of her petition for long-term benefits, asserting that this denial was an abuse of the VPA’s discretion.

Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Insurance Co., 458 F.3d 955 (9th Cir.2006), filed the day before argument in this appeal, fundamentally changed how we review…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Lamantia v. Voluntary Plan Administrator, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Carter v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Wright v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Lamantia v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Wright v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API