Legal Opinion

Weigend v. Hulsh

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 1, 1942No. Gen. No. 42,029PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This action is brought by five plaintiffs each one claiming to have an individual, separate and independent cause of action against the two defendants to recover damages based upon a conspiracy entered into by the two defendants to defraud plaintiffs out of their money. The complaint was in six counts. Defendants moved to strike the several counts and to dismiss the suit on a number of grounds, the first of which was that “There is a misjoinder of plaintiffs because the several causes of action do not arise out of the same transaction, or a series of related transactions, hut, on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Akely v. . KinnicuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Baker v. S. A. Healy Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  3. Bank of Montreal v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Akely v. KinnicuttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Heartt v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Opal v. Material Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  2. People ex rel. Pope County v. ShetlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  3. Baumgardt v. IsaacsIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Rodriguez v. Credit Systems Specialists, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Curran v. Harris Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API