Williams v. Ansehl
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; Charles B. Earis, Judge. Suit in equity by Thomas L. Williams, doing business as the May-bell Laboratories, against Benjamin Ansehl, doing business as the Lash-brow Laboratories Company. Decree for defendant on cross-bill, and complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
TRIEBER, District Judge.
Upon a former appeal this court reversed a decree in favor of the plaintiff, the appellant on this appeal, holding that his trade-mark infringed Mr. Ansehl’s. In conformity with thé opinion (267 Fed. 9) the mandate directed the District Court “to enter a decree enjoining the appellee, Thomas L. Williams, doing business as the Maybell Laboratories, from further use of the trademark ‘Lash-Brow-Ine/ but that there be no accounting,”
The District Court, upon the receipt of the mandate, entered a new decree, which, after reciting certain findings of fact, contained the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gaines v. RuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Illinois v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Ansehl v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thornton v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Mortgage Loan Co. v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Pocono Rubber Cloth Co. v. J. A. Livingston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1936