State Personnel Division of Department of Administration v. Board of Personnel Appeals
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Trieweiler
I dissent from the majority opinion.
The majority is correct that pursuant to our decision in Matter of Mead (1988), 235 Mont. 208, 766 P.2d 1300, the Board of Personnel Appeals cannot review and correct the grade assigned to a particular class. However, the majority opinion is incorrect when it concludes that our decision in Mead and Section 2-18-203, MCA, requires a determination by the Board that employees were improperly classified before retroactive pay can be awarded. Our decision in Mead did not deal with the circumstances under which retroactive pay can be awarded, and there is nothing…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Classification Appeal of Mead v. Board of Personnel AppealsMontana Supreme Court · 1988