In Re Estate of Lux
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of San Mateo County settling the final account of an administrator. George H.‘ Buck, Judge settling account, with reservation of compensation of attorney for absent heirs. James M. Troutt, Judge settling compensation. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
— Charles Lux died about 1887 (the precise time does not appear in the transcript). On the twenty-fifth day of April, 1889, the superior court of San Mateo County, where the estate was in probate, made an order in which it is recited that one John Reynolds was on the fourteenth day of April, 1887, appointed to represent the absent heirs (naming them), and that said Reynolds is now superior judge of Santa Clara County, and that “James H. Campbell, of San José, California, has ever since been employed by and acted for such absent and minor heirs; it is therefore hereby ordered that said James…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Estate of CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Matter of the Estate of Estelle RetyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Hofmann's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Estate of CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Daly Bank & Trust Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Estate of BodgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.