Legal Opinion

Alvord National Bank v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Wise County. Tried below before Hon. J. W. Patterson.

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, Associate Justice.

Luther F. Ferguson , sued the Alvord Rational Bank and John T. Carter to recover eleven hundred dollars claimed to be due him by the defendants. His wife," Zedie Ferguson, intervened, and sought a recovery in her own right upon substantially the same allegations contained in plaintiff’s petition and some additional allegations hereinafter noted. Judgment was rendered denying plaintiff a recovery, but in favor of the intervener against the defendants for eight hundred and fifty-six dollars, and from the judgment in favor of the intervener the defendants have appealed.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chase v. SwayneTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Marler v. HandyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Cameron v. FayTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Pierce v. FortTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Pool v. E. H. Chase & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lisle Patton & Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel v. Collin D. Porterfield, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  3. Williams v. Corpus Christi Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Russell v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Witt v. TeatCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API