In re Chantix (Varenicline) Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, District Judge.
Pending before the court is the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and exhibits in support of said motion as to (1) the adequacy of the July 1, 2009, label, and (2) the running of the statutes of limita*1336tions based on the July 1, 2009, label (doc. 590); a memorandum in support of said motion (doc. 591); the plaintiffs’ brief in opposition to said motion (doc. 602); exhibits in support of said opposition (docs. 609 and 610); and the defendant’s reply (doc. 617). Having considered the foregoing, the court finds as follows:
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mark Blackburn v. Shire US IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- In re Chantix (Varenicline) Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
- Lopez-Ramirez v. Grupo HIMA-San Pablo, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020