Legal Opinion

Porter v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 2003No. 28361PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

A motion to dismiss an inmate’s third petition for post-conviction relief is before the Court. George J. Porter appealed pro se the district court’s order granting the State of Idaho’s motion for summary dismissal of his third petition for post-conviction relief and the State has now filed a motion to dismiss that appeal based upon Idaho Code § 19- 2719. Because the post-conviction claims raised by Porter were known or reasonably should have been known at the time he filed his first petition for post-conviction relief, he is barred from raising those claims in this third…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pizzuto v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Paz v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Fields v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Porter v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Porter v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. LeavittIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API