Legal Opinion
Stuart v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 2010No. 34200Published
1Opinion of the Court
232 P.3d 813 (2010)
Gene Francis STUART, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of Idaho, Respondent.
No. 34200.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, November 2009 Term.
May 10, 2010.
Nevin, Benjamin, McKay & Bartlett, LLP, Boise, and Federal Defender Services of Idaho, Moscow, for appellant. Oliver Loewy argued.
Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. L. Lamont Anderson argued.
HORTON, Justice.
Gene Frances Stuart (Stuart) appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his fourth petition for post-conviction relief as untimely under I.C. § 19-2719. In this appeal, Stuart argues that I.C. §…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.