Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Spencer

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 31, 2017No. AC38050PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.

*506 The plaintiff, Brenna M. Spencer, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motions for contempt and granting the motion for modification and termination of alimony filed by the defendant, Robert B. Spencer. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in (1) terminating alimony on the basis of her cohabitation, (2) modifying alimony on the basis of a substantial change in the defendant's financial circumstances, and (3) denying her motion for contempt. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*507 The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Remillard v. RemillardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. State v. DehaneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Chavez-Miranda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brendon A. Boyce v. Julie A. Jarvis, f/k/a Julie A. BoyceWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Spencer v. SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. Murphy v. MurphyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API