Legal Opinion

Pagan v. Spencer

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1951No. Civ. 14708PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants to quiet title to certain real property. Defendants cross-complained to quiet their title thereto. Judgment went for defendants quieting their title. Plaintiff appeals.

Question Presented

The absconding escrow holder was the agent of which party in the sale and purchase of the property ?

Pacts

The parties stipulated to practically all the facts. Originally plaintiff had purchased a certain lot in Richmond from a tax title buyer. Defendants orally agreed to purchase the lot from plaintiff, who directed defendants to go to the office of a real estate broker named Bowe to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shreeves v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hildebrand v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Gorton v. DotyIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Walsh v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Rezos v. Zahm & Nagel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc. v. Spitters (In Re Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1994
  2. Naftzger v. American Numismatic SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. APSB BANCORP v. Thornton GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Asher v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Bixby Ranch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API