Legal Opinion

Criner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1913No. 2566PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

The appellant appeals from a conviction of forgery with the lowest penalty prescribed by law fixed as his punishment.

There is no statement of facts with the record. There is the stenographer’s report of the trial of the case, made out in question and answer form, including objections, arguments of attorneys for both sides on the objections, the remarks and rulings of the court and such other matters as are taken down by court stenographers on the trial of the case. This, we presume, is intended as a statement of facts.

Tinder the statutes of this State and the many…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Essary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Felder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Hargrave v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Horace Kitchens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Cooley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API