Roberts v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of perjury and assessed the lowest punishment.
Appellant’s attorneys have filed a lengthy and forcible brief, which has had due consideration.
Prior to 1909 the stenographer’s Act authorized the stenographic report of the proceedings and testimony in question and answer form to be sent to this court as a statement of facts. After that law had been in effect for some time and this court had seen the workings of it, in Baird v. State, 51 Texas Crim. Rep., 322, said: "The Legislature should pass an amendment to the present stenographer’s law and require a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Hargrave v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Romez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922