Legal Opinion

Tower v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 22, 1917No. 1748PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7943 (T. D. 36586).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Eight dozen long-handled round-point polished shovels and 6 dozen D-handled square-point polished shovels were classified by the collector of customs as articles of metal not specially provided for *409and assessed for duty at 20 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 167 of the tariff act of 1913 which reads as follows:

167. Articles or wares not specially provided for in this section; * ⅜ * if composed wholly or in chief value of Ron, steel, ⅜ * ⅜ or other metal, hut not plated witli gold or silver, and whether partly or wholly manufactured, 20 per centum ad valorem.

The importer…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richardson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API