Legal Opinion
De Caro v. De Caro
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 5, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
22 N.J. Super. 463 (1952)
92 A.2d 97
THOMAS J. DE CARO, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
FRANK DE CARO, ALSO KNOWN AS FORTUNATO DE CARO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 6, 1952.
Decided November 5, 1952.
Before Judges FREUND, STANTON and CONLON.
Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Mr. Morris Pashman, attorney).
Mr. Ralph W. Chandless argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Chandless, Weller, Kramer & Frank, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, S.J.A.D.
The plaintiffs appeal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Trenton Street Railway Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Johnson v. HubbellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1855
- Headley v. LeavittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Van Name v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Van Name v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- De Caro v. De CaroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Crewe Corp. v. FeilerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Hughes v. BetenboughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Onderdonk v. Presbyterian Homes of NJ, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979