Legal Opinion

Goldkette v. Daniel

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1945No. Civ. 14858PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of defendants predicated upon the granting of their motion for a judgment on the pleadings, in an action for declaratory relief and accounting between the parties, plaintiff appeals.

So far as material the facts alleged in the complaint are:

On March 6, 1935, plaintiff and defendants entered into a written contract providing that defendants should render services as professional entertainers and that plaintiff should act as their business manager. The agreement provided that the proceeds of the enterprise should be divided equally among the six parties.

On July 3, 1942,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. United Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  2. Hise v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Klubnikin v. California Fair Plan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Kahn v. PelissettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Sandler v. CasaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Downer Corp. v. Union Paving Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Downer Corp. v. Union Paving Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API