Legal Opinion

Smania v. Mundaca Investment Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 1993No. 92-1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Judge.

Mary Ann Smania, owner of a time-share condominium interest, appeals a final summary judgment in favor of Mundaea, holder of a note taken from the FDIC, which was executed by Ms. Smania for the purchase of the time-share unit. Two issues are presented:

1. Whether the D’Oench, Duhme doctrine and Title 12 U.S.C. section 1823(e) prevent Smania from asserting personal defenses against Mundaea based upon the note evidencing Smania’s agreement to pay; and

2. Whether Mundaea takes from the FDIC as a holder in due course under federal common law and is thus protected from the defenses…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Baumann v. Savers Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Riverside Park Realty Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1978
  5. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. GordyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paradis v. Greater Providence Deposit Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Lake Forest Park, Inc. v. Federal Financial Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API