Motor City Engineering Co. v. Fred E. Holmes Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
In May, 1924, plaintiff, a Michigan corporation, began this suit against defendant, a Michigan corporation, to recover damages for an- averred breach of contract, and for items claimed on open account. Plaintiff did not pay fee and file its annual report for 1923, due August, 1924, nor for the years 1924 and 1925. Section 5, chap. 2, pt. 5, Act No. 84, Pub. Acts 1921 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 9053 [173]). At the trial plaintiff’s right to prosecute the case was challenged on statutory ground. Section 6, chap. 2, pt. 5, Act No. 84, Pub. Acts 1921 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 9053 [174]). We quote…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Dawn Construction Co. v. Paris Home Builders, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Meldman Cartage Co. v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Michigan Rural Development, Inc. v. El Mac Hills Resort, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Division Avenue Realty Co. v. McGoughMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Nedeau v. United PetroleumMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.