Legal Opinion

In re PE Corporation Securities Litigation

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 3, 2003No. 3:00cv705(CFD)(TPS)PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.

The lead plaintiffs, David Berlin and Vinh Voung, on behalf of a class consisting of all persons other than defendants who purchased the common stock of PE Corporation Celera Genomics Group (“Celera” or the “Company”) in a secondary public offering of Celera common stock conducted by PE Corporation (“PE”) on or about February 29, 2000 (the “secondary offering”), commenced this securities class action against the defendants, PE and certain officers and directors, alleging that they violated sections 11,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Guy O. Dove, Iii, Spargos Mining Nl v. Atlantic Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. DCP Midstream, LP v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  2. Dunford v. Rolly Marine Service Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
  3. Patrick v. Teays Valley Trustees, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2013
  4. Klein v. AIG Trading Group Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  5. Admiral Insurance Company v. Versailles Medical Spa, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API