Legal Opinion

Harper v. Coleman

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1996No. 2951326PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MONROE, Judge.

The plaintiff, Michael Harpér, appeals from a summary judgment entered for the defendant in a personal injury lawsuit.

Initially, we note that in order to enter a summary judgment, the trial court must determine that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c), Ala. R. Civ. P.; Silk v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 437 So.2d 112 (Ala.1983). For cases filed after June 11, 1987, Rule 56 is read in conjunction with the “substantial evidence rule,” § 12-21-12, Ala.Code 1975. See Bass v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Housing Authority of Birmingham Dist. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Dunson v. FRIEDLANDER RLTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Silk v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API