Legal Opinion

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Beard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1936No. 2867Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

Appellee has asked for additional conclusions of fact, which we give in the language requested by her, modified and explained as indicated :

“Requested Conclusions of Fact
“(1) Defendant owned and operated a line of railway through Jefferson county and Beaumont. A switch or passing track parallelled its main line, about 20 feet therefrom, extending from its yards, westward about 110 car lengths distant, where it entered its main line. Both tracks crossed Fourth street in Beaumont, at grade. The tracks were elevated about three feet above the street level which gradually approached…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wichita Falls Traction Co. v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Davis v. CastileTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Firszt v. Capitol Park Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Walters v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. The Great NorthernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API