Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. McCaughtry

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 23, 2003No. 01-C-1116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ADELMAN, District Judge.

Animated by the concern that multiple collateral attacks on state criminal convictions commenced long after trial harmed the states’ interest in finality, Congress enacted the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). ADEPA established a one year statute of limitations on applications for habeas corpus relief by state prisoners, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d); and, subject to certain narrow exceptions, a limit of one application per conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2). Thus, for the most part, state prisoners are now afforded only one…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cain v. WinnDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  2. Rhodes v. DobbsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  3. Stallings v. GierachDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API