Legal Opinion

Rogars v. St. Jude Hospital

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1967No. Civ. 29618PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J. *

Frances C. Rogars instituted the present action against St. Jude Hospital for damages for injuries she suffered as a patient, allegedly caused by negligence of the defendant’s nurses. In a jury trial verdict and judgment were in favor of the defendant, and the appeal is from the judgment.

The gravamen of the action, in summary, is that following surgery plaintiff, while in the bathroom of her hospital room, suffered a fainting spell; she pressed the emergency button in a call for help and immediately became unconscious; returned to her bed, she was given oxygen, but in the time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vedder v. BireleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Ford v. CHESLEY TRANSPORTATION CO. INC.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Edgett v. FairchildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. In Re Writ of Habeas Corpus by WatsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Jacob v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Merkwan v. LeckeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API