Legal Opinion
United States v. Taylor
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided December 16, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions
On Motion to Vacate Judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, District Judge.
On the 19th of October, 1894, in a criminal case pending in this court against Osmer Surplis a forfeiture was rendered against Albert Taylor, who was surety upon the bond of said Surplis, and a sci. fa. was issued against the said Taylor, requiring him to appear and show cause why said forfeiture should not be made final. On the 18th of March, 1897, judgment of forfeiture was made final against the said Albert Taylor. On the face of the judgment it is recited that due service had been had upon the said Albert Taylor. On November 21, 1907, the said Albert Taylor filed in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Earle v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Harris v. HardemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. DavenportDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1920
- Universal Transp. Co. v. National Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918