Dail v. Campbell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs Paul D. Bail and Violet W. Bail, hereinafter called “Bail,” in the sum of $38,812.80, on account of an alleged deficiency after foreclosure of a purchase-price mortgage on lands in Arizona. Defendants Herbert C. Armstrong and Eva Young Armstrong, hereinafter called “Armstrong,” are the sole appellants.
The facts as shown by the record before us are substantially as follows: January 10, 1955, in the State of Arizona, Clinton C. Campbell and Mary V. Campbell, hereinafter called1 ‘ Campbell, ’ ’ sold real property in the State of Arizona to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jackson v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969