Moon v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Shulman, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle after having been declared an habitual violator under Code Ann. § 68B-308. We affirm.
1. Defendant argues that there was insufficient evidence to authorize the finding that he had notice of his habitual violator status. We disagree. There was documentary evidence admitted at trial that official notice of revocation was sent by mail to the defendant. A certified copy of the postal receipt for such notice, signed by a Mrs. Larry Moon, was introduced in evidence, along with an official notification form signed by a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mayo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Hight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Blackmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hester v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Noles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Milner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985