Legal Opinion

Welborne v. Donaldson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 3, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Habeas corpus.' Before Judge Lumpkin. Eulton superior ■court. March 19, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

This court, during the present term, held that it had no jurisdiction to review by a writ of error a judgment of the criminal court of Atlanta, which was established by an act approved September 6, 1891. See Welborne v. State, 114 Ga. 793. The plaintiff in error in the present bill of exceptions, who had been convicted of a misdemeanor in that court, sought, after the rendition of the decision just mentioned, to obtain a discharge from custody upon a writ of habeas corpus. His application was de*564nied, and he excepted. It was based entirely upon the alleged unconstitutionality of the act above…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Welborne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Kelly v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clarke v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Daughtry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Gibson v. GoberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API