ESTATE OF AMARO v. City of Oakland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA, Circuit Judge:
This interlocutory appeal requires us to resolve only the following question certified by the district court: whether the doctrine of equitable estoppel should apply where a plaintiff believes she has a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim but is dissuaded from bringing the claim by affirmative misrepresentations and stonewalling by the police. We hold that the equitable doctrine does apply in such a context and affirm the district court’s holding on that legal question. 1
Background
On March 23, 2000, Jerry Amaro — a 36-year old Oakland resident — was arrested during a reverse drug…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- James F. Santa Maria v. Pacific BellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- UA Local 343 of the United Ass'n v. Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Stitt v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Alex Wayne Bolt v. United States of America, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Ptarmigan Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Geraldine Burley v. Jeffery GagackiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Mashaney v. Board of Indigents' Defense ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Gessele v. Jack in the Box, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Candor v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Thiel v. VenemanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.