Legal Opinion

Braswell v. Braswell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1990No. 883SC463PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The claim based upon respondeat superior having been eliminated from the case, the determinative question presented by this appeal is whether plaintiffs evidence tends to show that some independent negligence of defendant Sheriff proximately contributed to plaintiffs intestate being killed by Deputy Braswell. Plaintiff contends that the evidence tends to show defendant’s negligence in three respects, the first of which was failing to protect plaintiffs decedent from an attack by Billy Braswell after promising her that such protection would be provided. This theory of legal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Duane S. Marusa v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Bonsignore v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Murray v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Turner v. City of North CharlestonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hull v. OldhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Braswell v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API