New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Morrison
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Circuit Judge.
This was a suit under the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Law. The appellee’s petition contained allegations to the following effect: While appellee was acting in the course of his employment, two or more pieces of steel penetrated his right eye as a result of an act of a coemployee while engaged in the same employment. Because of the injury so received, appellee’s eye was removed, and, due to the steel particles being embedded in the eye, poisons were formed whieh had the effect, *217in addition to destroying the sight of the light eye, of injuring and incapacitating the other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Petroleum Casualty Co. v. SealeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. MorenoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. WolffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. ManleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Mitchell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1942