Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Manley
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment for appellee in an action for damages for personal injuries under the workmen’s compensation law of Texas. Appellant contends that the appellee failed to meet the burden of proof requisite to recovery in a compensation case; that the judgment was excessive; and that the trial court’s charge to the jury, with respect to instructions given and refused, was prejudicial and misleading.
It was admitted that appellee sustained •compensable injuries at the time and place and in the manner alleged; the extent of the injuries was the only real issue…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Petroleum Casualty Co. v. SealeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. AndersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. HevolowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flores v. Employees Retirement System of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Cooper Stevedoring of Louisiana, Inc. v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Harding v. EvansDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Cooper Stevedoring Of Louisiana, Inc. v. James WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Flores v. Employees Retirement System of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002