Legal Opinion

CORDERO v. EMRICH

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 22, 2024No. 3:20-cv-05654Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MISAEL CORDERO, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-05654 (RK) (JTQ) v. . MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY EMRICH, et al., Defendants. THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon pro se Plaintiff Misael Cordero’s (“Plaintiff”) two appeals, (ECF Nos. 84, 88), of Letter Orders issued by the Honorable Rukhsanah L. Singh, U.S.M.J. (the “Magistrate Judge”), (ECF Nos. 83, 86). Defendants Amy Emrich and Tina Cortes (“Defendants”) filed a brief in opposition to Plaintiff's first appeal.’ (ECF No. 85.) Plaintiff has not replied. The Court has considered the parties’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. Bull v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. Marks v. StrubleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
  5. Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API