Legal Opinion

In Re Bexar County Criminal District Attorney's Office

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2007No. 05-0613PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett

in which Justice HECHT, Justice O’NEILL, Justice WAINWRIGHT, and Justice BRISTER joined.

This case presents an issue of first impression: whether the work-product privilege protects prosecutors from testifying in a malicious prosecution suit when they have already released the prosecution file. Relator Bexar County Criminal District Attorney’s Office (“DA” or “DA’s Office”) provided its prosecution file to real party in interest David Crudup, who had sued relator Cynthia Blank for malicious prosecution. Crudup subpoenaed DA representatives to testify, but the trial court granted the DA’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re BassTexas Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. In Re Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  2. in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Lisa and Roger French v. Marco French, G.T. Morton, and Judy McCollum, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2012
  4. In re Park Cities BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  5. In re State ex rel. SkurkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API