Legal Opinion

Pulcifer v. Bishop

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1929No. Docket No. 112, Calendar No. 34,041PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The bill and cross-bill seek, principally,

quieting title and determination of certain property rights. Plaintiffs had decree. Defendants have appealed.

In 1899 James A. Green owned, title in fee, subject to mortgage, a parcel of land on St. Clair river in St. Clair county. A highway extended across the east end of this property, adjacent to and parallel with the river, which highway is now a paved trunk line known as St. Clair drive. A narrow strip of river bank, part of the parcel, was between the highway and the river itself; nearly all of the parcel was west of the highway. In 1900 Green…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Village of Grandville v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Murray v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Whitaker v. Erie Shooting ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lawson v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Smith v. FeneleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Peters v. Juneau-Douglas Girl Scout CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kirchen v. RemengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Anderson v. Cold Spring Tungsten, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Nome 2000 v. FagerstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API